This is very interesting. You can have a patent, but if you include GPL 3 licensing, you can’t exercise it, as long as you are credited with you previous work to the project?


clipped from
Most broadly, all versions of the GPL allow developers to copy, create, and modify code and freely redistribute it to other users who also may freely modify and redistribute it. However, on June 29, 2007, the Free Software Foundation released the hotly-debated final draft of GPL 3. GPL 3 had been several years in the making.
The goal of GPL 3 is to bring the concepts of GPL 2 into the modern era by addressing certain of GPL 2’s loopholes and omissions. In large part, GPL 2 did not provide patent protection for software because it wasn’t needed. At the time of GPL 2’s release in 1991, it addressed proprietary software head-on by its mere existence. The GPL was true free software and required downstream users who modified, developed, or used it to maintain its free nature by providing all source code downstream. However, GPL 2 no longer addresses the modern world’s problems.
  blog it

About James Grimes

A geek looking for some fun.
%d bloggers like this: